I FINALLY GOT A MEETING WITH CHILD SUPPORT SUPERVISORS, JUDY MCARN
(DIRECTOR), PATRICIA TAYLOR (CUSTOMER SERVICE), DEBBIE HENDERSON AND
TOMICKA HICKS (PROGRAM DIRECTOR). WELL, I WAS BIT APPREHENSIVE ABOUT
THIS MEETING BECAUSE I COULD NOT UNDERSTAND THE PURPOSE. MS MCARN
REASSURED ME THAT IT WAS SO THEY COULD EXPLAIN THINGS TO ME. I TOLD
HER THAT I AM PERFECTLY CAPABLE OF READING AND UNDERSTANDING SO
I DIDN'T NEET HER TO EXPLAIN ANYTHING TO ME. WE SCHEDULED THE MEETING
BECAUSE I SEE AT THIS POINT THAT I WILL HAVE TO SUE THEM. I WANT IT KNOWN
THAT I HAVE TRIED ALL AVAILABLE AVENUES TO SEEK A RESOLUTION. I AM
FIGHTING FOR OVER 40,00 CHILDREN THAT LIVE IN THIS STATE SO I HAVE TO BE
VIGILANT IN FOLLOWING PROTOCOL. DESPITE MY FEELINGS, I WENT TO HEAR
WHAT THEY HAD TO SAY.
THE WEEK BEFORE I SENT EACH OF THE SUPERVISORS A LIST OF QUESTIONS THAT I
WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ANSWERED AT THIS MEETING. I HAD THE ANSWERS TO EACH
QUESTION STRAIGHT OUT OF THE NCDHHS MANUAL.
MS TAYLOR IS THE MOUTHPIECE FOR NC CHILDSUPPORT. I THOUGHT THIS WAS
STRANGE BUT I WENT ALONG WITH IT. I INFORMED THEM THAT I WOULD LIKE TO
RECORD THIS WITH A VOICE RECORDER. MS MCARN TOLD ME THAT I COULDNT
EVEN THOUGH NC HAS A 1 PERSON CONSENT N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287. TO
RECORDING AND I AM THE PERSON CONSENTING. I TOLD HER THAT IT DIDNT
MATTER WHAT SHE DIDNT LIKE, IT WAS THE LAW AND MY RIGHT. SHE SAID I
WOULD HAVE TO RESCHEDULE IF I WANTED TO RECORD,
THE MEETING BEGAN WITH MS TAYLOR EXPLAINING TO ME HOW THE SYSTEM
WORKS. I TOLD HER THAT I UNDERSTOOD IT QUITE WELL SO SHE MADE A BIG
SHOW OF PULLING OUT PAPERS SO SHE COULD EXPLAIN HOW MY CHILD SUPPORT
WAS DISBURSED. I HALTED THE MEETING TO SAY THAT THIS WAS NOT AND HAS
NEVER BEEN A QUESTION THAT I HAD. MY COMMUNICATIONS HAVE BEEN VERY
CLEAR AND CONCISE AND NEVER HAD I ASKED FOR ANY EXPLANATIONS OF DIS-
BURSEMENTS. MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ABOUT THE VIOLATIONS OF STATE
AND FEDERAL LAWS BY THEM TO CHILDREN RECIEVING PUBLIC ASSISTANCE.
I SAID THAT CHILD SUPPORT HAS TO BE SPLIT BETWEEN OPEN CASES AND SHE
SAID ITS NOT LIKE THAT.Effective October 1, 2000, URPA balances are split equally among cases
when the client has multiple open cases I TRIED TO SHOW HER THE EXCERPT OF OUT OF THE NC DHHS
MANUAL THAT CONFIRMED IT AND SHE QUICKLY TOLD ME THAT SHE WOULD
NOT EVEN LOOK AT IT. I FOUND THIS INTERESTING SINCE THERE IS NO OTHER
WAY FOR YOU TO DO YOUR JOB. SO MY QUESTION WAS HOW IS IT THAT YOU
DONT USE YOUR MANUAL. SHE SAID SHE WASNT GOING TO LOOK AT MY PROOF
AND DID NOT PROVIDE ANY OF HER OWN. SHE WAS NOT GOING TO ARGUE WITH
ME AND I AM SIMPLY ASKING A QUESTION ABOUT HOW DOES SHE KNOW WHAT
TO DO IF YOU ARE NOT USING THE NCDHHS MANUAL. OF COURSE THERE WAS
NO RESPONSE SO I EXCUSED MYSELF. LIKE I THOUGHT THE MEETING WAS NOT
ABOUT A RESOLUTION BUT MORE OF THEIR INACCURATE INFORMATION THAT
THEY TELL PUBLIC ASSISTANCE CLIENTS. THEY ARE STEALING MONEY AND
NEVER THOUGHT SOMEONE WOULD FIND OUT BECAUSE IT IS FOR POOR CHILDREN.
Thursday, November 27, 2014
Thursday, November 20, 2014
ENTITLEMENT PROGRAMS
THIS COUNTRY IS SO FULL OF THE HAVES THAT LOOK DOWN ON THE HAVE-NOTS.
THEY PASS LAWS AND JUDGEMENT ON THE ONES THAT ARE HOMELESS, HUNGRY,
LIVE IN DEPRESSED AREAS, OR NEED PUBLIC ASSISTANCE JUST TO GET BY. THEY
CALL IT " GOVERNMENT ENTITLEMENT" WHEN PEOPLE NEED HELP, BUT IT IS NOT
THAT WHEN BANK OF AMERICA NEEDS TO BE BAILED OUT BECAUSE OF GREED.
IT IS NOT THAT WHEN WALMART GETS MASSIVE TAX BREAKS AND DOES NOT HAVE
TO PAY WORKERS A LIVING WAGE EVEN WHEN IT HAS ALMOST 1/4 OF THE
COUNTRIES WEALTH. IT IS NOT THAT WHEN EMPLOYERS DO NOT HAVE TO PAY A
LIVING WAGE BUT MINIMUM TO ADULTS WITH FAMILIES TO SUPPORT. IT IS ONLY
GOVERNMENT ENTITLEMENT WHEN "POOR PEOPLE" NEED ASSISTANCE.
IT CAN BE A LOT OF REASONS FOR THIS. DIVORCE, LOSS OF A JOB(S), ADDICTION,
RAPE ARE JUST TO NAME A FEW. THESE ARE NOT A BUNCH OF LAZY PEOPLE THAT
DON'T WANT TO WORK. PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO WORK DO NOT SACRIFICE
THEIR FAMILIES TO GO TO CRAPPY JOBS FOR LOW PAY TO "FEED THEM". LAZY
PEOPLE DON'T STAND ON BUS STOPS AND WALK TO THESE JOBS. LAZY PEOPLE
DON'T GO HUNGRY TO ENSURE THAT THEIR CHILDREN ARE FED AND CLOTHED.
LAZY PEOPLE DON'T SACRIFICE TIME, ENERGY AND THE LITTLE MONEY THEY
HAVE TO TRY AND KEEP A ROOF OVER THE HEADS OF THEIR FAMILIES. LAZY
PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT SIT IN OFFICES AND SCHEME TO TAKE FROM THOSE
THAT NEED IT THE MOST. LAZY PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT COLLECT MONEY
MEANT FOR OTHERS LIKE STATE GOVERNMENTS AND PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF
"ENTITLEMENT" PROGRAMS. LAZY PEOPLE DO NOT CARE WHO THEY HURT JUST
THAT THEYGET THE MONEY. NOW, WHO DO YOU THINK IS "ENTITLED"?
THEY PASS LAWS AND JUDGEMENT ON THE ONES THAT ARE HOMELESS, HUNGRY,
LIVE IN DEPRESSED AREAS, OR NEED PUBLIC ASSISTANCE JUST TO GET BY. THEY
CALL IT " GOVERNMENT ENTITLEMENT" WHEN PEOPLE NEED HELP, BUT IT IS NOT
THAT WHEN BANK OF AMERICA NEEDS TO BE BAILED OUT BECAUSE OF GREED.
IT IS NOT THAT WHEN WALMART GETS MASSIVE TAX BREAKS AND DOES NOT HAVE
TO PAY WORKERS A LIVING WAGE EVEN WHEN IT HAS ALMOST 1/4 OF THE
COUNTRIES WEALTH. IT IS NOT THAT WHEN EMPLOYERS DO NOT HAVE TO PAY A
LIVING WAGE BUT MINIMUM TO ADULTS WITH FAMILIES TO SUPPORT. IT IS ONLY
GOVERNMENT ENTITLEMENT WHEN "POOR PEOPLE" NEED ASSISTANCE.
IT CAN BE A LOT OF REASONS FOR THIS. DIVORCE, LOSS OF A JOB(S), ADDICTION,
RAPE ARE JUST TO NAME A FEW. THESE ARE NOT A BUNCH OF LAZY PEOPLE THAT
DON'T WANT TO WORK. PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO WORK DO NOT SACRIFICE
THEIR FAMILIES TO GO TO CRAPPY JOBS FOR LOW PAY TO "FEED THEM". LAZY
PEOPLE DON'T STAND ON BUS STOPS AND WALK TO THESE JOBS. LAZY PEOPLE
DON'T GO HUNGRY TO ENSURE THAT THEIR CHILDREN ARE FED AND CLOTHED.
LAZY PEOPLE DON'T SACRIFICE TIME, ENERGY AND THE LITTLE MONEY THEY
HAVE TO TRY AND KEEP A ROOF OVER THE HEADS OF THEIR FAMILIES. LAZY
PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT SIT IN OFFICES AND SCHEME TO TAKE FROM THOSE
THAT NEED IT THE MOST. LAZY PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THAT COLLECT MONEY
MEANT FOR OTHERS LIKE STATE GOVERNMENTS AND PEOPLE IN CHARGE OF
"ENTITLEMENT" PROGRAMS. LAZY PEOPLE DO NOT CARE WHO THEY HURT JUST
THAT THEYGET THE MONEY. NOW, WHO DO YOU THINK IS "ENTITLED"?
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
GOVERNMENT GREED
THE MORE I RESEARCH THE CHILD SUPPORT ISSUE IN THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA, THE MORE I SEE THIS AS A SYSTEMIC PROBLEM .
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS KNOW THAT THEY HAVE TO ANSWER TO NO ONE.
POOR PEOPLE ARE TO BUSY BEING POOR TO KNOW WHAT THE LAWS ARE AND
BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TOLD. THIS GIVES THEM FREE REIN TO PILLAGE AND
PLUNDER. THEY LINE THEIR POCKETS AT THE EXPENSE OF POOR PEOPLE,
CHILDREN INCLUDED. IN MY IGNORANCE, I THOUGHT THAT I WAS
ALERTING THEM, BUT THAT IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THEY WERE UNAWARE.
REACHING OUT TO THE COMMISSIONERS AND THE NEW
ELECTED SENATOR TOM TILLIS, HAD ME BLOCKED FROM THEIR TWITTER
ACCOUNTS. I THINK THEY ARE MORE SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT SOMEONE
LIKE ME FOUND OUT AND RESEARCHED THE LAWS AND EVEN THE DHHS MANUAL
FOR THE STATE TO DISCOVER THE VIOLATIONS. ORIGINALLY, I THOUGHT IT JUST
MIGHT BE SOME TYPE OF COMPUTER ERROR BUT IT IS NOT. THIS IS INTENTIONAL
THEFT BY THE STATE OF NC TO STEAL FROM POOR CHILDREN. NOT SUPRISINGLY
THIS IS NOT THE ONLY STATE THAT HAS THIS PRACTICE. WHEREVER THERE IS
MONEY
TO BE HAD, GREEDY BUREAUCRATS ARE THERE TO SIPHON OFF AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE FROM THE POOR. THEY HAVE GOTTEN SO COMFORTABLE WITH
THAT THEY HAVE NO PROBLEM SENDING LETTERS THROUGH THE MAIL WITH
BLATANT LIES AND MISQUOTES. IT IS ULTIMATE STEADY INCOME. NC CHILD
SUPPORT HAS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENFORCE AND COLLECT ON CHILD SUPPORT
ORDERS. THEY HAVE AMAZING RESOURCES AND EVEN THE THREAT OF JAIL TO
ENFORCE COMPLIANCE FROM THE NON-CUSTODIAL PARENT. THAT PARENT PAYS
AND THE STATE COLLECTS . THEN THEY TELL THE CHILD THAT IT IS OWED TO THE
STATE BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR AND IT IS THEIR FAULT. THE STATE HAS THE
RIGHT TO STEAL BECAUSE THE CHILDREN ARE POOR. THEY DON'T CARE WHAT
HAPPENS TO CHILDREN IN POVERTY BECAUSE THAT MONEY BELONGS TO THE
GOVERNMENT BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PAY THEM FOR BEING POOR.
CAROLINA, THE MORE I SEE THIS AS A SYSTEMIC PROBLEM .
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS KNOW THAT THEY HAVE TO ANSWER TO NO ONE.
POOR PEOPLE ARE TO BUSY BEING POOR TO KNOW WHAT THE LAWS ARE AND
BELIEVE WHAT THEY ARE TOLD. THIS GIVES THEM FREE REIN TO PILLAGE AND
PLUNDER. THEY LINE THEIR POCKETS AT THE EXPENSE OF POOR PEOPLE,
CHILDREN INCLUDED. IN MY IGNORANCE, I THOUGHT THAT I WAS
ALERTING THEM, BUT THAT IS ONLY POSSIBLE IF THEY WERE UNAWARE.
REACHING OUT TO THE COMMISSIONERS AND THE NEW
ELECTED SENATOR TOM TILLIS, HAD ME BLOCKED FROM THEIR TWITTER
ACCOUNTS. I THINK THEY ARE MORE SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT SOMEONE
LIKE ME FOUND OUT AND RESEARCHED THE LAWS AND EVEN THE DHHS MANUAL
FOR THE STATE TO DISCOVER THE VIOLATIONS. ORIGINALLY, I THOUGHT IT JUST
MIGHT BE SOME TYPE OF COMPUTER ERROR BUT IT IS NOT. THIS IS INTENTIONAL
THEFT BY THE STATE OF NC TO STEAL FROM POOR CHILDREN. NOT SUPRISINGLY
THIS IS NOT THE ONLY STATE THAT HAS THIS PRACTICE. WHEREVER THERE IS
MONEY
TO BE HAD, GREEDY BUREAUCRATS ARE THERE TO SIPHON OFF AS MUCH AS
POSSIBLE FROM THE POOR. THEY HAVE GOTTEN SO COMFORTABLE WITH
THAT THEY HAVE NO PROBLEM SENDING LETTERS THROUGH THE MAIL WITH
BLATANT LIES AND MISQUOTES. IT IS ULTIMATE STEADY INCOME. NC CHILD
SUPPORT HAS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO ENFORCE AND COLLECT ON CHILD SUPPORT
ORDERS. THEY HAVE AMAZING RESOURCES AND EVEN THE THREAT OF JAIL TO
ENFORCE COMPLIANCE FROM THE NON-CUSTODIAL PARENT. THAT PARENT PAYS
AND THE STATE COLLECTS . THEN THEY TELL THE CHILD THAT IT IS OWED TO THE
STATE BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR AND IT IS THEIR FAULT. THE STATE HAS THE
RIGHT TO STEAL BECAUSE THE CHILDREN ARE POOR. THEY DON'T CARE WHAT
HAPPENS TO CHILDREN IN POVERTY BECAUSE THAT MONEY BELONGS TO THE
GOVERNMENT BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PAY THEM FOR BEING POOR.
Monday, November 17, 2014
CHILD SUPPORT BENEFITS STATES NOT CHILDREN THAT ITS FOR.
NO ONE WANTS TO DISCUSS THIS AND I WONDER WHY. SOME OF THE MOSTLY
LIKELY REASONS SEEM TO BE THE ONES NOT TALKED ABOUT.
WHENEVER A GROUP OF PEOPLE ARE POOR OR NEED ASSISTANCE FROM OTHERS
WE JUST ASSUME THAT IT IS BEING DONE BECAUSE THEIR ARE LAWS. THERE ARE
AN ABUNDANCE OF LAWS ON THE BOOKS BUT NOT ENFORCED. SO WHAT GOOD
ARE THEY THEN? THEY ALLOW US TO FEEL BETTER ABOUT OURSELVES AS A
COUNTRY. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD TO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT WE ALLOW POOR
CHILDREN TO BE ROBBED BY STATE GOVERNMENTS. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD
THAT WHEN IT COMES TO CHILDREN IN POVERTY, WE LOOK THE OTHER WAY
BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR.
WE FEEL BETTER FORCING "DEADBEAT PARENTS" TO PAY FOR THE
SUPPORT OF THEIR CHILDREN BUT NOTHING ABOUT THE CHILDREN ACTUALLY
RECIEVING THE PAYMENTS. ITS MORE IMPORTANT TO STATES TO RECIEVE
"BONUS" MONEY FOR COLLECTING AND ENFORCING PAYMENTS THAN TO
ACTUALLY PROVIDE BASIC NEEDS FOR CHILDREN. THE POOR CHILDREN DONT
GET TO DECIDE, BUT THE STATE DECIDES THAT ANY MONEY THEY GET BELONGS
TO THE STATE. THE STATE COLLECTS WHAT IS NOT THEIRS AND THE CHILDREN
GO TO BED HUNGRY. THEN TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY THEY COLLECT
FEDERAL BONUSES AND THE CHILDREN STILL DONT GET A THING. WE HAVE
TO STAND UP FOR OUR CHILDREN AND MAKE THEM BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
LIKELY REASONS SEEM TO BE THE ONES NOT TALKED ABOUT.
WHENEVER A GROUP OF PEOPLE ARE POOR OR NEED ASSISTANCE FROM OTHERS
WE JUST ASSUME THAT IT IS BEING DONE BECAUSE THEIR ARE LAWS. THERE ARE
AN ABUNDANCE OF LAWS ON THE BOOKS BUT NOT ENFORCED. SO WHAT GOOD
ARE THEY THEN? THEY ALLOW US TO FEEL BETTER ABOUT OURSELVES AS A
COUNTRY. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD TO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT WE ALLOW POOR
CHILDREN TO BE ROBBED BY STATE GOVERNMENTS. IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD
THAT WHEN IT COMES TO CHILDREN IN POVERTY, WE LOOK THE OTHER WAY
BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR.
WE FEEL BETTER FORCING "DEADBEAT PARENTS" TO PAY FOR THE
SUPPORT OF THEIR CHILDREN BUT NOTHING ABOUT THE CHILDREN ACTUALLY
RECIEVING THE PAYMENTS. ITS MORE IMPORTANT TO STATES TO RECIEVE
"BONUS" MONEY FOR COLLECTING AND ENFORCING PAYMENTS THAN TO
ACTUALLY PROVIDE BASIC NEEDS FOR CHILDREN. THE POOR CHILDREN DONT
GET TO DECIDE, BUT THE STATE DECIDES THAT ANY MONEY THEY GET BELONGS
TO THE STATE. THE STATE COLLECTS WHAT IS NOT THEIRS AND THE CHILDREN
GO TO BED HUNGRY. THEN TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY THEY COLLECT
FEDERAL BONUSES AND THE CHILDREN STILL DONT GET A THING. WE HAVE
TO STAND UP FOR OUR CHILDREN AND MAKE THEM BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
THE LAW CHANGED IN 2005
When laws change, it doesn't mean a thing when it comes to the most vunerable/pooriest population. The federal and state law changed in 2005 but they did not tell TANF/WORKFIRST/WELFARE recipients. To this day 11/2014 if you go in any NC DHHS/NC CHILD SUPPORT OFFICE, their paperwork says if you collect public assistance all of your child support goes to the state even though it violates the state and federal laws. NC DHHS violates this law as well by forcing you to sign an illegal form stating all of you child support goes to the state. You don't know that they can only collect what they pay when they have an order.
Child Support is for children not greedy government. Its easy to judge someone's situation when you don't know the circumstances. You apply for public assistance because you need help. You are told you have to apply for child support to receive benefits. They aggressively pursue the parent for child support and get an order. States receive federal benefits for establishing, enforcing and collecting on child support orders. STATES PAY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HALF OF ALL MONEY COLLECTED. IF THE CHOOSE TO PAY THE FAMILIES THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. NC CHOOSES NOT TO PAY FAMILIES WITH OVER 40,000 CHILDREN LIVING IN POVERTY. The child/children/families who should benefit from this never see this money. The absent parent pays 500 a month and the child/children in NC receive max of 274. The rest goes to the state because they know you don't know the law and gives them the right to steal it.
Monday, November 10, 2014
NC RECEIVE FEDERAL BONUSES FOR CHILD SUPPORT
HOW DO YOU COLLECT FEDERAL MONEY AS A BONUS
FOR STEALING FROM POOR CHILDREN?
FEDERAL INCENTIVES FOR NORTH CAROLINA CHILD SUPPORT
The North Carolina Child Support Services program is largely financed
by federal, state, and county funding. The total budget for the North
Carolina Child Support Services program was $160.7 million in State Fiscal
Year 2012–13. Counties provided $39.5 million in county funds for child
support services programs, and the State appropriated $1.4 million to
support the operations of the CSS State Office. The federal government
provided the majority of program funding by reimbursing 66% of eligible
child support expenditures for state administration and county operations
for a total federal match of $96.5 million. The federal incentive award.passed on to counties was $14.4 million while non-public assistance
custodial parents paid approximately $3.1 million in client fees for child
support services. In total, the North Carolina Child Support Services
program expended $131 million on county operations and $30 million on
state administration in State Fiscal Year 2012–13.
PG 4 REPORT 2014-08
Public assistance cases. Public assistance cases are those in which
the custodial parent and/or children receive financial assistance
from the county department of social services. Public assistance
clients waive their right to receive child support payments in
exchange for TANF benefits, which are administered by the Work
First program in North Carolina. The support collected from the
noncustodial parent is returned to the State to help reimburse the
public assistance debt. About 12% of child support cases in North
Carolina are public assistance cases.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/PED/Reports/documents/ChildSupport/Child_Support_Report.pdf
PG 7 Report No. 2014-08
NORTH CAROLINA DOES NOT EVEN INCLUDE THE STATE LAW IN ITS REPORTS TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. G.S. 110-137 accomplishes an automatic assignment of rights of child support for recipients of Work First for or on behalf of a dependent child up to the amount of WFFA/TANF paid.
FOR STEALING FROM POOR CHILDREN?
FEDERAL INCENTIVES FOR NORTH CAROLINA CHILD SUPPORT
The North Carolina Child Support Services program is largely financed
by federal, state, and county funding. The total budget for the North
Carolina Child Support Services program was $160.7 million in State Fiscal
Year 2012–13. Counties provided $39.5 million in county funds for child
support services programs, and the State appropriated $1.4 million to
support the operations of the CSS State Office. The federal government
provided the majority of program funding by reimbursing 66% of eligible
child support expenditures for state administration and county operations
for a total federal match of $96.5 million. The federal incentive award.passed on to counties was $14.4 million while non-public assistance
custodial parents paid approximately $3.1 million in client fees for child
support services. In total, the North Carolina Child Support Services
program expended $131 million on county operations and $30 million on
state administration in State Fiscal Year 2012–13.
PG 4 REPORT 2014-08
Public assistance cases. Public assistance cases are those in which
the custodial parent and/or children receive financial assistance
from the county department of social services. Public assistance
clients waive their right to receive child support payments in
exchange for TANF benefits, which are administered by the Work
First program in North Carolina. The support collected from the
noncustodial parent is returned to the State to help reimburse the
public assistance debt. About 12% of child support cases in North
Carolina are public assistance cases.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/PED/Reports/documents/ChildSupport/Child_Support_Report.pdf
PG 7 Report No. 2014-08
NORTH CAROLINA DOES NOT EVEN INCLUDE THE STATE LAW IN ITS REPORTS TO FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. G.S. 110-137 accomplishes an automatic assignment of rights of child support for recipients of Work First for or on behalf of a dependent child up to the amount of WFFA/TANF paid.
SUPERVISORS COLLECTING PERSONAL BONUSES TO STEAL FROM POOR CHILDREN
SUPERVISORS COLLECTING
NC CHILD SUPPORT SUPERVISOR TOMICKA HICKS AND
SHARON STANLEY SAY THE ONLY THING THEY HAVE
TO TELL ME IS " BECAUSE THEY SAY SO". THEY ARE
UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW
BECAUSE ANY ONE THAT RECIEVES PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO QUESTION
THE "STATE". THEY DECIDE HOW TO INTERPRET
THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE CHILDREN
LIVING IN POVERTY IN NC CAN HAVE THEIR CHILD
SUPPORT TAKEN BY THE STATE BECAUSE THEY
ARE POOR, ANYWAY. THAT MONEY GOES INTO
THE PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OF SUPERVISORS, THAT
ALREADY GET FEDERAL KICKBACKS FOR COLLECTION.
NC CHILD SUPPORT SUPERVISOR TOMICKA HICKS AND
SHARON STANLEY SAY THE ONLY THING THEY HAVE
TO TELL ME IS " BECAUSE THEY SAY SO". THEY ARE
UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO HAVE TO FOLLOW THE LAW
BECAUSE ANY ONE THAT RECIEVES PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE DOES NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO QUESTION
THE "STATE". THEY DECIDE HOW TO INTERPRET
THE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS. THE CHILDREN
LIVING IN POVERTY IN NC CAN HAVE THEIR CHILD
SUPPORT TAKEN BY THE STATE BECAUSE THEY
ARE POOR, ANYWAY. THAT MONEY GOES INTO
THE PERSONAL ACCOUNTS OF SUPERVISORS, THAT
ALREADY GET FEDERAL KICKBACKS FOR COLLECTION.
Friday, November 7, 2014
HOW IS A STATE ENTITLED TO FEDERAL MONEY FOR THE POOR BUT THE POOR ARE NOT ENTITLED TO IT?
SADLY 26% OF THE CHILDREN OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA LIVE IN
POVERTY FOR VARIOUS REASONS. ONE OF THEM IS THE STATE CHOOSES TO
STEAL FROM THE CHILDREN ON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. THERE IS VIRTUALLY NO
OVERSIGHT FOR STATES WHEN IT COMES TO ADMINISTERING PROGRAMS TO THE
POOR. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIVES THEM BLOCK GRANTS TO USE
BUT DOES NOT REQUIRE ANYTHING OTHER THAN AN ANNUAL REPORT FROM THEM.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR NEEDY STATES IS MANDATED BUT Federal TANF funds are considered “mandatory spending” in the federal budget. The grants are
entitlements to the states—the law entitles states, tribes, and territories to a specified amount of
funding. The law specifically states that TANF does not entitle individuals to benefits and services. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32748.p. SO THE REAL QUESTION IS
HOW IS A STATE ENTITLED TO COLLECT FEDERAL MONEY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE
FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF THE MOST POVERTY-STRICKEN AMERICANS
BUT THE CITIZENS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO THEM? THIS IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE
OF THE TRUTH OF THE IMAGINED "SAFETY NET" THAT IS PAID FOR BY AMERICANS
BUT IS JUST A WAY OF SOUNDING GOOD.
THE STATE OF POVERTY IN NC FOR CHILDREN IS HUGE BUT YET NC CHILD SUPPORT
POVERTY FOR VARIOUS REASONS. ONE OF THEM IS THE STATE CHOOSES TO
STEAL FROM THE CHILDREN ON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. THERE IS VIRTUALLY NO
OVERSIGHT FOR STATES WHEN IT COMES TO ADMINISTERING PROGRAMS TO THE
POOR. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIVES THEM BLOCK GRANTS TO USE
BUT DOES NOT REQUIRE ANYTHING OTHER THAN AN ANNUAL REPORT FROM THEM.
FEDERAL FUNDING FOR NEEDY STATES IS MANDATED BUT Federal TANF funds are considered “mandatory spending” in the federal budget. The grants are
entitlements to the states—the law entitles states, tribes, and territories to a specified amount of
funding. The law specifically states that TANF does not entitle individuals to benefits and services. https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL32748.p. SO THE REAL QUESTION IS
HOW IS A STATE ENTITLED TO COLLECT FEDERAL MONEY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE
FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF THE MOST POVERTY-STRICKEN AMERICANS
BUT THE CITIZENS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO THEM? THIS IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE
OF THE TRUTH OF THE IMAGINED "SAFETY NET" THAT IS PAID FOR BY AMERICANS
BUT IS JUST A WAY OF SOUNDING GOOD.
THE STATE OF POVERTY IN NC FOR CHILDREN IS HUGE BUT YET NC CHILD SUPPORT
CAN STEAL FROM THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR.
.http://www.spotlightonpoverty.org/map-detail.aspx?state=North-Carolina
.http://www.spotlightonpoverty.org/map-detail.aspx?state=North-Carolina
GOVERNMENT IS KNOWN TO STEAL FROM THE POOR BUT THE CHILDREN IS A NEW LOW
Government has always preyed on the poor. They don't have to be accountable
to them because they dont know the laws. But stealing from the pooriest children just is
reprehensible. The DRA of 2005 changed the laws governing the former AFDC PROGRAM. States
no longer had the right to all child support but the amount that they state pays for public assistance.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/css/resource/child-support-provision-in-the-deficit-reduction-act-of-2005-dra.
NC CHILD SUPPORT does not have to follow the laws of the federal or state governments, They
allow Supervisor TOMICKA HICKSthicks@wakegov.com <thicks@wakegov.com>; and Program
Representative Sharon Stanley Sharon Stanley <sharon.stanley@dhhs.nc.gov>;;;to interpret the
laws.
The fact that federal government has passed the laws and interpreted,so there is no confusion
does not matter. They do not have to even know what is in their NC DHHS manual or read it for that
matter. Their response is "because they say so". How dare anyone challenge them or ask them
to verify anything? Lest of all someone that has recieved public assistance. NC had the right to steal
from your children because that is the price of being poor. Makes you wonder does every state feel
the same way?
to them because they dont know the laws. But stealing from the pooriest children just is
reprehensible. The DRA of 2005 changed the laws governing the former AFDC PROGRAM. States
no longer had the right to all child support but the amount that they state pays for public assistance.
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/css/resource/child-support-provision-in-the-deficit-reduction-act-of-2005-dra.
NC CHILD SUPPORT does not have to follow the laws of the federal or state governments, They
allow Supervisor TOMICKA HICKSthicks@wakegov.com <thicks@wakegov.com>; and Program
Representative Sharon Stanley Sharon Stanley <sharon.stanley@dhhs.nc.gov>;;;to interpret the
laws.
The fact that federal government has passed the laws and interpreted,so there is no confusion
does not matter. They do not have to even know what is in their NC DHHS manual or read it for that
matter. Their response is "because they say so". How dare anyone challenge them or ask them
to verify anything? Lest of all someone that has recieved public assistance. NC had the right to steal
from your children because that is the price of being poor. Makes you wonder does every state feel
the same way?
Thursday, November 6, 2014
CHILD SUPPORT IS FOR POOR CHILDREN NOT THE STATE
IF THIS WAS ABOUT EMA OR SEBASTAIN, IT WOULD GARNER PUBLIC OUTRAGE.
AMERICANS WOULD NOT EVEN DREAM OF STANDING SILENT WHILE MONEY WAS
BEING STOLEN FROM CHILDREN. HAS OUR HATRED OF THE POOR MADE US SO
JADED THAT IT NO LONGER MATTERS THAT IT AFFECTS THE BABIES? IS IT EASIER
TO HATE THEM FOR BEING POOR THAN ADMIT THAT WE ARE THE PROBLEM OR
SOLUTION? IF THIS WAS ANY OTHER GROUP OF CHILDREN, AMERICANS WOULD
BE MARCHING IN THE STREETS TO PROTECT OUR YOUNGEST CITIZENS. NO ONE
MARCHES FOR THE POOR NOT EVEN THE CHILDREN. NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE THAT
SOME OF THE POVERTY THAT THEY ARE IN IS CAUSED BY GREED OF THE GOVERN-
MENT. NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS MADE BEING POOR
A CHARACTER FLAW INSTEAD OF AN ECONOMIC CONDITION THAT IS CAUSED BY
GREED. THE STORY OF PEOPLE LIVING OFF WELFARE MAKES US NOT WORRY
ABOUT THE BILLIONS BEING STOLEN FROM US EVERY DAY BY BIG BANKS AND
CORPORATIONS THAT BUY OUR LAWS AND THE SYSTEM THAT GOVERNS IT. WE
WOULD RATHER BLAME THE VICTIMS OF A SYSTEM THAT IS DESIGNED TO BENEFIT
THE MINORITY OF THE WEALTHY THAN THE MAJORITY OF THE POOR.
NC CHILD SUPPORT IS STEALING MONEY FROM THE CHILDREN ALREADY LIVING IN POVERTY. THEY ROUTINELY TELL TANF/WORKFIRST/WELFARE RECIPIENTS THAT THEY HAVE TO SIGN OVER THEIR RIGHTS TO CHILD SUPPORT TO THE STATE. WHAT THEY DONT TELL IS THAT THE STATE CAN ONLY KEEP WHAT THEY ACTUALLY PAY FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BY LAW.
.ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS
AMERICANS WOULD NOT EVEN DREAM OF STANDING SILENT WHILE MONEY WAS
BEING STOLEN FROM CHILDREN. HAS OUR HATRED OF THE POOR MADE US SO
JADED THAT IT NO LONGER MATTERS THAT IT AFFECTS THE BABIES? IS IT EASIER
TO HATE THEM FOR BEING POOR THAN ADMIT THAT WE ARE THE PROBLEM OR
SOLUTION? IF THIS WAS ANY OTHER GROUP OF CHILDREN, AMERICANS WOULD
BE MARCHING IN THE STREETS TO PROTECT OUR YOUNGEST CITIZENS. NO ONE
MARCHES FOR THE POOR NOT EVEN THE CHILDREN. NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE THAT
SOME OF THE POVERTY THAT THEY ARE IN IS CAUSED BY GREED OF THE GOVERN-
MENT. NO ONE SEEMS TO CARE THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS MADE BEING POOR
A CHARACTER FLAW INSTEAD OF AN ECONOMIC CONDITION THAT IS CAUSED BY
GREED. THE STORY OF PEOPLE LIVING OFF WELFARE MAKES US NOT WORRY
ABOUT THE BILLIONS BEING STOLEN FROM US EVERY DAY BY BIG BANKS AND
CORPORATIONS THAT BUY OUR LAWS AND THE SYSTEM THAT GOVERNS IT. WE
WOULD RATHER BLAME THE VICTIMS OF A SYSTEM THAT IS DESIGNED TO BENEFIT
THE MINORITY OF THE WEALTHY THAN THE MAJORITY OF THE POOR.
NC CHILD SUPPORT IS STEALING MONEY FROM THE CHILDREN ALREADY LIVING IN POVERTY. THEY ROUTINELY TELL TANF/WORKFIRST/WELFARE RECIPIENTS THAT THEY HAVE TO SIGN OVER THEIR RIGHTS TO CHILD SUPPORT TO THE STATE. WHAT THEY DONT TELL IS THAT THE STATE CAN ONLY KEEP WHAT THEY ACTUALLY PAY FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BY LAW.
As a condition of eligibility for Work First, the applicant/recipient must assign to the state the "rights to support" from any other person on his/her own behalf, or on behalf of any other family member for whom the applicant/recipient is applying for or receiving assistance. G.S. 110-137 accomplishes an automatic assignment of rights of child support for recipients of Work First for or on behalf of a dependent child up to the amount of WFFA/TANF paid.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)