CHILD SUPPORT BENEFITS STATES NOT CHILDREN THAT ITS FOR.

NO ONE WANTS TO DISCUSS THIS AND I WONDER WHY.  SOME OF THE MOSTLY

LIKELY REASONS SEEM TO BE THE ONES NOT TALKED ABOUT.

WHENEVER A GROUP OF PEOPLE ARE POOR OR NEED ASSISTANCE FROM OTHERS

WE JUST ASSUME THAT IT IS BEING DONE BECAUSE THEIR ARE LAWS.  THERE ARE

AN ABUNDANCE OF LAWS ON THE BOOKS BUT NOT ENFORCED.  SO WHAT GOOD

ARE THEY THEN?  THEY ALLOW US TO FEEL BETTER ABOUT OURSELVES AS A

COUNTRY.  IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD TO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT WE ALLOW  POOR

CHILDREN TO BE ROBBED BY STATE GOVERNMENTS.  IT DOESN'T LOOK GOOD

THAT WHEN IT COMES TO CHILDREN IN POVERTY, WE LOOK THE OTHER WAY

BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR.

 WE FEEL BETTER FORCING "DEADBEAT PARENTS" TO PAY FOR THE

SUPPORT OF THEIR CHILDREN BUT NOTHING ABOUT THE CHILDREN ACTUALLY

RECIEVING THE PAYMENTS.  ITS MORE IMPORTANT TO STATES TO RECIEVE

"BONUS" MONEY FOR COLLECTING AND ENFORCING PAYMENTS THAN TO

ACTUALLY PROVIDE BASIC NEEDS FOR CHILDREN.  THE POOR CHILDREN DONT

GET TO DECIDE, BUT THE STATE DECIDES THAT ANY MONEY THEY GET BELONGS

TO THE STATE.  THE STATE COLLECTS WHAT IS NOT THEIRS AND THE CHILDREN

GO TO BED HUNGRY.   THEN TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY THEY COLLECT

FEDERAL BONUSES AND THE CHILDREN STILL DONT GET A THING.  WE HAVE

TO STAND UP FOR OUR CHILDREN AND MAKE THEM BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.